Local “Experts” – Page 2 – Clarkston Secrets

I’m posting my response to William Basinger’s letter to the editor on both the Clarkston Secrets and on the Clarkston Secrets (Comments) page. I’m not going to reproduce Mr. Basinger’s letter here; if you have an interest in what he has to say, you can find it in the paper or on the Clarkston News website.

**************************************************************************************

Mr. Basinger’s letter to the editor doesn’t refute anything that I said in my letter to the editor.

The “resign to run” issue only affects the offices of city council or mayor as these are the only elective offices in city government. Each of these offices are held for two-year terms. The resign to run issue arises only when an incumbent office holder wants to abandon the office to which s/he was elected half-way through the two-year term. Given that the duties of a city council member and the mayor are very similar (the mayor has some extra ceremonial duties and chairs the council meetings), there isn’t much reason to do this in the normal course – but there is every reason to do it if the office holder wants to create a vacancy to be filled by a candidate of his or her choice.

My objections to charter proposal #1 are not a “conspiracy theory.” To understand why eliminating resign to run is a bad idea, we need look no further than the actual conduct of Mayor Haven and Council member Marsh, both of whom used a cloak of secrecy in violation of the charter to try to run as unopposed candidates in the November 2018 election and happened to get caught. Mr. Marsh was aware that Mr. Haven planned to resign from his city council position in the middle of his term to run for mayor and was running in violation of the charter by gathering petition signatures before he resigned, and Mr. Marsh used that insider information to submit his petition in an attempt to run as an unopposed candidate for the remainder of Mr. Haven’s term. The “resign to run” proposal would authorize this conduct. It’s as simple as that.

Of course there would be a resignation by operation of law if someone wins election into a new position. I didn’t argue otherwise and that avoids my point. I think it’s a stretch to say that the voters presumably trust a newly elected official’s judgement with regard to appointing his or her replacement into an opening created by an undisclosed campaign for a different office. We have four candidates running for four council openings – all will be elected, whether we trust their judgment or not.

Mr. Basinger also stated that “the reason for placing these proposals before the voters is so they can make the final decision, rather than the committee or council.” This suggests that the charter committee is doing you a favor by giving you a voice on these proposals, but that is not true at all. The reason that these proposals are being placed before you is because ONLY the voters can change the charter.

Please take a stand against secrecy and vote NO on charter proposal #1.

Thank you.

About

Welcome! If you want to comment on any post and don’t see the comment box at the very bottom of the post, please click on the title of the post and the comment box will appear at the very bottom of the post. Please keep your comments civil so I don’t have to delete them. You can also give a thumbs up (or down) to someone else’s comment.

I try to be factually accurate, so if you see something that’s not, please let me know in the comments or send me an email at clarkstonsecrets1@gmail.com.

You can subscribe to new posts by entering your email in the box that says, “Subscribe to Blog via Email.”

You can search entries by using the search box to enter key words, choosing a category from the drop-down menu under “Categories,” or looking through an entire month of posts by choosing a month under “Archives.”

Clickable links to the most recent three posts are listed at the bottom of this right-hand column.

Questions? Email me at clarkstonsecrets1@gmail.com.

Categories

Notable Quotes

Each of you, for himself or herself, by himself or herself, and on his or her own responsibility, must speak. It is a solemn and weighty responsibility and not lightly to be flung aside at the bullying of pulpit, press, government, or politician. Each must decide for himself or herself alone what is right and what is wrong, which course is patriotic, and which isn’t. You cannot shirk this and be a man, to decide it against your convictions is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor. It is traitorous both against yourself and your country.

Let men label you as they may, if you alone of all the nation decide one way, and that way be the right way by your convictions of the right, you have done your duty by yourself and by your country, hold up your head for you have nothing to be ashamed of.

~Mark Twain

Doesn't matter what the press says. Doesn't matter what the politicians or the mobs say. Doesn't matter if the whole country decides that something wrong is something right.

This nation was founded on one principle above all else: The requirement that we stand up for what we believe, no matter the odds or the consequences. When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world –

No, you move.

~Captain America

It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.

~Theodore Roosevelt

Category: Local “Experts”

Response: Eliminating “Resign to Run” is a Bad Idea